#memorablemomentsineducation #127

I’ve probably been stalling a bit to make this post. At first I stalled because of the subject, and then later stalled because of the writing. I’ve also been debating the merits of using Facebook for my posts moving forward, so today marks the transition back to my blog page.

I hope I will be able to look back on this moment in history and recognize it as the turning point it should be, the moment when we realized how more than 400 years of systemic racism brought forth this reckoning and subsequent, sustainable change. To assist in a kind of personal reckoning, I’ve been recalling the moments when race entered a classroom where I learned or taught.

In 6th grade, I wrote the N-word on a sheet of paper. My friend Samantha (I’ve changed her name) and I had been walking through our neighborhood (a very white one) and heard someone use the epithet. I can’t remember all the circumstances of the encounter, but no matter because I do remember that we knew it was a bad word, something you don’t say in public, something we’d never heard people really use. I imagine its forbidden nature might be the reason I wrote it down in a note to my friend later that week. I knew the word had power, but sometimes that power eludes us unless we share it, we say it, we write it. But the real story happened when my teacher Mrs. Ater found the slip of paper, recognized my handwriting, and confronted me about the word I’d chosen to repeat. Looking back, I suspect Mrs. Ater was a good Christian who, despite having dealt with an incredibly difficult group of students that year, remained dedicated to the end that we would all walk out of her class decent human beings. In line with her personality, she didn’t scold me or reprimand me; instead, she spoke to me as a precocious kid who should have known better–let’s be honest, who did know better–but for whatever reason had written the word. Perhaps some sort of divine providence had ensured she find it. She wielded her disappointment in me to effect. She explained the crushing history of that word (at this point, musical artists had not quite reappropriated it), and she left an indelible mark on me, helping me realize how language shapes and alters us, convincing me that the words we use matter, and ensuring I’d never say nor write that word again.

In the 8th grade, I decided to run for class president. That summer, Spike Lee’s masterpiece Do the Right Thing had been released to wide acclaim. Now, I’m not claiming to be some sort of “woke” teenager in 1990 because I’m fairly certain I didn’t see the film until I was in high school, but I do remember the film poster and its colorful logo with geometric shapes seen everywhere. In true running-for-school-office fashion, I co-opted the film’s logo and title for my own campaign slogan, as in “Do the Right Thing–Vote for Carlye” or some such crap. Until just now, I’m sure I never considered the cultural appropriation at work in that act, but I did know at the time something about my choice struck others as odd. One afternoon I was at school for a volleyball match, and students from another junior high had come to play and spectate. My school had very few students of color (but in comparison to my elementary school, we were downright diverse), and our opponents came from a different part of the city where obviously more black students attended. I happened to be in the hallway, and a couple students from the “away” team stopped in their tracks when they spotted one of my campaign posters. One girl reacted, “I didn’t know black kids went here?” and…..I didn’t know I’d signaled some kind of blackness by referencing a Spike Lee Joint film. See? I wasn’t woke at all, just naive and ignorant. At the time, I didn’t know if I’d crossed some line, but my poster felt like a transgression. A couple years later, after watching the movie, I knew those girls would have felt cheated somehow to learn a white kid had used that logo, had–in the lame economy of junior high politics–tried to profit from a black man’s art. Even now, I wonder about the fine line between celebrating black culture and objectifying it.

Years later, I learned to become a teacher in Washington, D.C. Prior to my official student-teaching semester, I had the chance to participate in a practicum experience where I observed a masterful teacher and dabbled a little in leading some lessons. For my practicum, I opted to volunteer in a tony Bethesda, MD, neighborhood just across the district-state line so that I could student-teach in the D.C. public schools the following semester. While I attended a school of education that was fairly progressive when it comes to racial and socio-economic equity in schools and had read extensively about the disparity in education provided to students, I was not prepared for the reality of it all. Driving the three-mile stretch from Pyle Junior High in Montgomery County to Woodrow Wilson High School in D.C., you could probably see the color spectrum shift before your eyes. During my practicum, I’d taught wealthier, more polished versions of myself and my friends growing up. And then when I walked into my classroom where I would student-teach for 15 weeks, I saw a range of students I’d never encountered before. For the first time in my life, I was a minority in the classroom, but still a minority with authority, which speaks to my relative privilege in most situations, even the uncomfortable ones. While my students didn’t identify with me and my experiences, a white girl from Kansas as opposed to black students who’d lived in D.C. their whole lives or the myriad others whose parents had immigrated here, I represented a youthful hope that I wouldn’t be like all the other teachers they’d had. We made it work, but those kids’ zip code certainly diminished their future prospects and potential success. For so many reasons, those students taught me more than I taught them, including the lesson that institutions can and do damage children–even the ones designed to help them flourish–and that the damage often runs along the fault lines of race.

But it was more than a decade into my teaching career when I made an error in judgment that I shall not forget. At the time, I was teaching in a suburban (i.e. overwhelmingly white) high school, and there was one young woman of color whom I’d taught in an honors English course a couple years before. She had been a gifted writer, an astute thinker, and likely the hardest-working student I’ve ever had. She was the student who would write 10 pages when you’d asked for 5. She was the girl who came to me after school for unnecessary extra help to ensure she was ready for whatever would show up on the next day’s test. She had been raised by a strong woman who not only ensured she receive a quality education, but who also ingrained in her daughter the notion that she would have to work twice as hard and thrice as smart to shine among her white counterparts.

And, oh did she shine! But at what cost?

I can’t help but wonder these days what parts of herself, her culture, her identity did she deny in order to succeed in all-white classrooms? What injustices, both large and small, did she endure, and still endures, to graduate in the Top Ten, to attend an exclusive undergraduate degree program, and to begin practicing medicine? I know of one such injustice because I committed it. She and I had been chatting after school, discussing some topic that bordered on the issue of race. I can’t remember if it was Obama’s presidency or blues music or something else entirely, but we landed on a tidbit of information about African-American history that I knew and she didn’t. Before I even knew what I was saying, I had made a joke about whether she was really black, given her ignorance of this minutiae. Knowing her, I’m sure she sloughed off the comment with a polite response and then went home to process what we would now term a “microaggression.” I don’t recall the exact words I said, but I worry still that she remembers precisely what I told her that day. I do not share this story because I’m seeking someone to forgive me or to assuage my guilt; in fact, I call upon this moment often, in my private thoughts, as a way to remind me to do better because at that moment I could not have done worse. More importantly, I share this story because it illustrates the tacit racism too many of us ignore and so many people of color have been trying to highlight. Obviously this moment cannot compare to a police officer crushing the breath out of a black man in handcuffs, but we need–okay, maybe I need–to acknowledge these examples of racism also exist and deserve our attention. I need to own the choices, both conscious and unconscious, that I’ve made if I ever hope to move forward in support of my black students, black colleagues, and black friends.

As I look back at these different moments, I see an education of sorts, or at least a progression. We all can point to obvious examples of racism in our schools and our communities–we see them on the news all too often–but it’s those more nuanced acts that require our energy now. By ignoring the jokes, the off-handed comments, the miscues, the discomforting discussions, we have missed the opportunity to grow from this moment. I’m reminded of Maya Angelou’s words, “Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better.” I can’t continue to tell myself or enable others to tell themselves that we didn’t know any better because my memories prove we do. As our understanding of systemic and structural racism evolves, so too should our responses. And while I am embarrassed and ashamed of my behaviors–I shudder at the thought of my students, colleagues, and friends reading this–the shame and embarrassment of not acknowledging any of this would be far worse. So, I’m here to witness and participate in a beginning…..that will finally bring about change.

Note: Writing about myself always feels like a selfish act of sorts, and this particular issue of race begs the question whether writing about my experiences really does anything. I just hope any readers see this for what it is, a personal meditation made public because that’s the only way I learn from what I write. If you’re looking for something else to watch or read, may I suggest the following works created by people of color who speak much more eloquently to the issues at hand:

Black-ish, Season 4, episode 1, “Juneteenth”–The Juneteenth holiday is coming up this week. If you, like me, had no idea of this date and its significance, watch this excellent episode.

Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates–Coates offers an argument couched in very personal circumstances about how history and society have treated the black body.

Master of None, Season 1, episode 4, “Indians on TV”–While Aziz Ansari explores a slightly different kind of racism, it’s racism all the same. He digs into why representation matters, all while offering his usual charm and wit.

When They See Us, 4 episodes–Ava DuVernay’s realistic depiction of the young men ruined by a corrupt judicial system forced me to recognize how powerful stories are in convincing us that what we’ve been told about someone must be true.

Such a Fun Age by Kiley Reid–This novel set at the tail-end of Obama’s presidency captures the ways in which we naively believed we couldn’t be racist anymore because we’d elected a black man to be President. Reid highlights the weird ways race shows up in our lives and interactions, even when we’re trying really hard not to be racist.

#memorablemomentsineducation #1:

I found myself in a meeting yesterday with a lot of district leaders, most of whom had come through the ranks as teachers first. Our superintendent asked us to share our “most memorable moment in education,” which solicited all kinds of stories about their teachers, their roles as administrators, their work with students, and even their own children’s encounters with learning in and out of school. Each of us commented on how hard it was to come up with just ONE moment, and listening to others’ stories reminded me of even more experiences I’ve had, probably numbering in the 100s.

So, I’ve decided to post a #memorablemomentineducation every school day this year (or at least as many days as I can remember to do it)! Thankfully, most are happy memories, but I’m sure there are a few moments of frustration in 35+ years of formal education. Here’s number 1:

I always say I’m a teacher because I was fortunate to have been taught by so many amazing teachers in my own life. I attended my neighborhood public schools and never thought twice about whether another option was available to me. Some may say my experiences are an exception, but I will tell you that is not the case. Year in and year out, I was taught by amazing women and men who were dedicated to their craft and to their students.
So I want to tell you about my French teacher Vicki Swetz who happened to appear in my news feed yesterday. I started taking French classes a year later than all the other “honors kids” in my school. As a result, I was not supposed to take the final French V course as a senior. But Mme. Swetz saw a desire and a drive in me that translated into an offer to tutor me in French IV over the summer between my junior and senior years. She handed me a textbook, assigned me the exercises, and met with me periodically over those two months to practice my speaking skills. She didn’t get paid. She didn’t roll her eyes when I skipped a few chapters in favor of hanging with my friends. She probably didn’t even mind when I didn’t say “thank you” enough. I mean, what teacher would do such a thing?! Well, my teacher. I remember sitting in her office learning the subjunctive, expanding my vocabulary, and practicing the appropriate way to pronounce an “r.” In subsequent years on a couple occasions, once as student and once as teacher, I got to travel to France with her to practice all that I had learned, all that she had taught me. Merci, Madame!

A Teacher by Any Other Name?

Just this week, I came across an article on Edutopia, a website I follow that posts all things education and advocates for various theoretical and practical changes to our education system, where its author Ben Johnson suggests we find a new name for the title teacher. Specifically, Johnson lands on the term learning engineer as a way to incorporate the myriad jobs asked of today’s teacher and to shift our focus towards more of a student-centered environment rather than the didactic model of the past.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I do agree we ask way more of teachers today than we did 22 years ago when I began teaching. AND, having a master’s degree in Experiential Education, a field of pedagogy most educators have never heard of, places me on the constructivist end of the teaching and learning spectrum. However, I do pause at this idea that we need to change what we call ourselves.

Even though our profession may not garner the respect it deserves, I am proud when I tell people I’m a teacher. That is not always the case for many of my younger colleagues, but I probably relate differently to the term, not because I come from a long line of teachers (I don’t), but because I had the honor of being taught by so many accomplished, thoughtful, life-changing people who convinced me this was a profession worth joining. And in the 80s when I attended elementary school, A Nation at Risk had yet to enter the psyche of Americans, and we did not yet believe the narrative that public schools are failing or that our teachers are falling behind. You see, I remember gathering in the library of my elementary school to watch on a rather small tube television as Christa McAulliffe, the first teacher in space, launched into the skies on the Challenger shuttle only to witness its tragic explosion more than a minute later. While I’m sure I’ve superimposed my later understanding of that moment onto my memories of it, I know we all believed in the significance of that feat for NASA, for schoolchildren, and for our nation. We didn’t get out of reading class for an hour because another Space Shuttle was launching; we got out of class because a teacher was launching into space and that was history. In those minutes leading up to the launch, the teaching profession had been elevated, respected, revered, and young children across the country were paying attention.

I fiercely believe that words have power, so I understand the urge to coin a new moniker for what we do in hopes of changing how others perceive our work. By calling us “learning engineers,” people might recognize the kind of knowledge and expertise necessary to excel at teaching, but we also risk insulting the intelligence of those very people who choose to discredit the job no matter its name. Rather than calling us something else, why not reclaim the term? Why can’t we remind people what makes this profession so foundational and so essential to our communities, to our society, and to our country?

Part of what Johnson alludes to in his essay also speaks to some primary issues with the art and act of teaching itself. In changing the terminology for teaching, he attempts to double-down on a century-old idea that classrooms should be altars to student-centered learning, a concept exalted by John Dewey and other progressivist educators at the turn of the last century . Believe me when I say I have worshiped at those same altars, and I do regret the decades of traditional schooling where teachers believed their job was to stand at a chalkboard, lecture while students took notes, and pontificate about the knowledge worth knowing. We could talk all day about the power invested in a teacher’s position when she gets to hold court at the front of a classroom, and why it’s been so challenging to give up that power; I agree we needed new structures to break down that dynamic so children saw themselves as responsible for their learning and active participants in creating it. Yet, I find it interesting that when educators finally embraced student-directed learning, we also began to question the value of a teacher in the equation of learning, giving our society permission to wonder if students really even needed a teacher at all!

More and more school districts are turning to online education programs, some perhaps with the intent of retaining crucial funding, but probably more so to tap into the prevailing theory that learning can and should happen via whatever avenue the student feels is best. I recognize that every student is an individual with individual needs and desires and challenges, so I don’t begrudge the expansion of these programs per se. I just wonder whether our students might still need some direction, some advice, some feedback (all face-to-face) from a teacher.

I earned my master’s degree through a self-directed program at Prescott College. Even at the alternative high school where I taught students for whom traditional schooling didn’t work, colleagues questioned the validity of a program where I directed my own course of study. Really, they would be correct to wonder whether I learned everything necessary to do my job well, but what most missed (and even I downplayed) was the fact I had an adviser, a facilitator, a sounding board, an expert to whom I could pitch my questions and confusions with the expectation that he would direct me, push me, and, ultimately, TEACH me. While a select few might be able to teach themselves computer programming by watching a Khan Academy video or learn how to connect the ideas of a literary work to the pressures and beliefs of its historical time period by logging into Shmoop, most of us need someone wiser and more experienced than us to show the way.

I read Ian Leslie’s book Curious last summer, mostly because I was curious to learn what makes us want to know more. Is our curiosity innate, either we have it or we don’t? Or can curiosity be developed, nurtured, and, thus, taught? Leslie seems to land on the argument that curiosity can only flourish when we already possess some kind of knowledge about the world around us, knowledge that typically comes to us in some form of direct instruction. Have you ever noticed that when you learn a tidbit of information, the definition of a word for instance, that you inevitably see that piece of information everywhere? You read an article that uses the word. A colleague inserts that word into a sentence. A meme appears in your news feed that plays on the meaning on that word. From my own experience, just last week I was reading the Pulitzer-prize winning book The Overstory, which taught me in a beautiful narrative the fact that trees communicate with one another via unseen networks in the ground and through chemical secretions in the air. Honestly, learning this fact astonished me. Yet, even more astonishing was this concept being mentioned off-hand in an episode of Amazon’s Sneaky Pete. I see these flashes of recognition in my students all the time. They’ll learn about an author they’d never heard of, say Kurt Vonnegut, or a blues musician like Robert Johnson, and then discover these people exist in the ether around them, happily sharing their encounters with me as they recognize bits of cultural knowledge in other spheres of their lives. At that point, they become hooked, they’re curious to learn more!

Those moments that build their curiosity often come from me telling them about something, not from their own discovery. As a teacher, one who lectures, instructs, facilitates, and even engineers learning opportunities, I have the power to create curiosity in my students. Research tells us that a teacher can have a measurable impact on student learning well into the future, yet I sometimes fall into the trap of feeling like I don’t have much influence over my students. Perhaps that’s the case because I have bought into this idea that teachers are supposed to engineer environments where students create their own knowledge, rather than teaching them about what there is to learn. I hope we can reclaim the title teacher so that each of us recognizes the power we have, that we matter, that it matters that we teach, not just engineer learning for students. I want my students to take ownership of their learning, to see themselves and their discovery as the central focus of a school. But in the process of transforming education, please don’t discredit what we teachers do to get them to that place where they can learn.

Who Doesn’t Love a Good Tradition? Or a Good Slice of Pie?

For ten years or so, I have spent a week in June at the National Speech and Debate Association’s (@speechanddebate) National tournament. Thousands of high school (and now middle school) students converge on a city, usually in middle America, to show off their rhetorical and oratorical skills. The week always seems ripe for tradition, and I relish the chance to help my students feel part of a past and future legacy. But, let’s be honest, the tradition is really for me, and the students just give me license to celebrate some hokey act or weird hobby.

I wonder if I’ve always been obsessed with tradition, or if it might be something that came to me with age–perhaps, the fact of years past strikes us in a moment, and we feel the need to preserve that feeling well into the future? Whatever the cause, I do know teaching and coaching has always been the place where I conjure up these traditions.

Years ago, I would have my sophomore English students write a letter to next year’s students on their manila folder so it could be passed on to those very students when they embark on the journey of taking my class. Some of those letters offered droll stories about reading A Raisin in the Sun aloud in class, while others provided some sage advice about how to read the books rather than SparkNotes or participate in class discussions because their efforts prove worth it! Invariably, students always saw this as an opportunity to take witty jabs at me and my idiosyncrasies, which actually gave future students permission to joke and laugh with me, knowing I would be able to handle it. When I left that school for another one six years ago, I felt a twinge of guilt that I had allowed a sweet tradition to die, but I knew my love for tradition would certainly live.

But you might be asking how this connects with a bunch of speech and debate nerds wandering the halls of a school on their summer break while talking to walls. The NSDA has its own share of tradition, as the organization (once called the National Forensic League) honors coaches for their years of dedication to the activity and their students by awarding “diamonds,” highlights their best practitioners by inducting them into the Hall of Fame, awards finalists with trophies in events named after contributors to the history of speech and debate, and bestows a lei flown in by the Hawaii contingent on each national champion. We hold students who have qualified to the National tournament each of their four high school years in high regard, but I don’t think we do so just because their qualification marks a rare achievement. Instead, I’d like to believe we honor those students because they are the ones who can travel from Nationals in Utah to Alabama to Florida to Texas and carry with them the legacy of the event and pass on our traditions to others.

My favorite tradition from Nationals week, however, is a personal one born out of coincidence in a shared love for the one true thing you will find in all great townsPIE.

I began coaching at Chaparral High School in 2004 with another head coach who had also grown up and competed in Kansas. In 2005, together we qualified our first competitors to the Bluebonnet Nationals in Dallas, Texas, where we also discovered our common affinity for all kinds of pie. If I remember correctly, we happened upon a small pie shop in Grapevine, Texas, and my high school memories of hanging out at Perkin’s or Tippin’s after a debate tournament, where my friends and I would sit, laugh, razz each other, and eat pie a la mode until the wait staff would kick us out, came flooding back. For me, pie and debate are inextricably linked, something I’d forgotten in the intervening decade since I’d graduated high school…but so thankful to recall in my early years as a coach. Out of that memory, a new tradition was reborn that has followed me through two debate programs, 15 years of coaching, and hundreds of students.

If I could, I would explain to all those students that my love of tradition, my sharing of that tradition, is the way I connect the years from my start to my finish and beyond. With the advent of smartphones, the search for the perfect pie has become much easier but just as enjoyable, as I read Yelp reviews and local journalists’ write-ups of the best pies in town. I have driven 30 minutes out of my way to find the right pies for our team to enjoy. And once we find that perfect pie (or, really, pies since we have to try every flavor!), we sit down as a team and laugh and razz each other, and I get to believe for a brief moment that I’m still in high school. But I quickly snap out of my reveries and realize how great it is to be a teacher and coach who gets to immerse my students in a tradition, that tangible connection between the past and future which reminds us this time, too, will pass and we should hang on to the moments by marking them in some special way because we never know who might inherit our tradition and make it breathe!

Some of our best places for PIE:

Emporium Pies–Dallas, Texas

The Good Pie Company–Miami, Florida

Tippin’s Pies–various locations

Please add your own suggestions for awesome pie shops in the Comments below!

Why I Choose to Write

Every semester, I sit down with my students for a one-on-one writing conference. In that conference, I ask them questions about their writing process like: what do you do when you write, do you ever scrap something and start over, how do you know when it’s done? Inevitably, we end up talking about why they don’t perceive themselves as writers, but simply as “students of writing.” While there’s nothing wrong with being a student of writing as we all have to start there, a shift can occur in all our writing when we begin to see ourselves as writers with an audience, writing for the purposes of communicating with someone on the other side of the paper or the screen. I always hope that in illuminating that shift for my students, I can help them find a true purpose and audience for their writing, one that moves beyond writing for a grade and helps them see how empowering it can be to write to communicate. Truthfully, though, I have talked a good game for years, but I have not sat down and written for those same purposes of communication in far too long. So, today, I’ve decided to write, not as a “teacher of writing,” but as a writer, reaching out to a virtual audience through my words and ideas.

My hesitation to write in this kind of public way probably stems from some kind of self-consciousness that plagues every creative mind. Not since I attempted to write a novel on the old IBM Selectric typewriter I borrowed from my father’s office have I had the hubris or the bravado to put word to page. Of course, in those days the chances of anyone reading a few typewritten pages from a ten-year-old, so the specter of the internet makes this endeavor even more frightening. The fact someone might actually read these words one day scares me into being very careful about what I say and how I say it. Yet, I’ve also learned from my students that we need to write in order to figure out what we think. Sometimes, it is only through writing (or talking with another person face-to-face) that we consider our ideas in the context of an audience, thus forcing us to reckon with what we believe based on the words we write. I hope that in writing for all of you, whomever you may be, I will come to terms with more of my thinking about and my understanding of the world around me.

This blog will be my attempt at trying to do more now because I’m not getting younger, nor is my writing getting better just sitting here. Eventually, I hope to see the fruits of this labor as they blossom into better writing and even more experience and expertise to share with my students. Calling one’s self a writer means staking a claim for your ideas and your voice. I think I’m ready to try to admit I have things to say and I can develop a voice to say them. Thank you for being my audience and for giving me a virtual person to communicate with so that I might figure out how much I have to share.